wikifemfuchde2019:exam_like_exercises
Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisioneRevisione precedenteProssima revisione | Revisione precedente | ||
wikifemfuchde2019:exam_like_exercises [2019/06/05 20:21] – [tubo forato] ebertocchi | wikifemfuchde2019:exam_like_exercises [2019/06/05 20:47] (versione attuale) – [Others] ebertocchi | ||
---|---|---|---|
Linea 1: | Linea 1: | ||
+ | ===== MSC.Marc/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== pierced tubolar profile ==== | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | steel, thickness 0.5 mm | ||
+ | |||
+ | four basic loadcases | ||
+ | * axial load, 15.708 N | ||
+ | * x-oriented bending moment, 37.493 Nmm | ||
+ | * y-oriented bending moment, 37.493 Nmm | ||
+ | * torsional moment, 74.987 Nmm | ||
+ | the magnitude of the resultants are defined in order to obtain unit axial or shear stress values on the unnotched part. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For each loadcase, evaluate the peak equivalent von Mises stress along the structure. | ||
+ | |||
+ | You may resort to RBE2 links at beam ends; the slave nodes may be constrained in their full set of d.o.f.s . | ||
+ | |||
+ | The proposed modeling should take advantage of problem symmetries or skew-symmetries, | ||
+ | Please pay attention in suitably removing residual rigid body motions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Further loadcases may be defined based on the evaluation of the bending and torsional stiffnesses for the meshed component. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the case of bending, the buckling load may be further determined by resorting to the Linearized Pre-Buckling analysis procedure ('' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Others ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The repetition of the lab exercises carried out during the lessons may be requested, possibly with slight variations. | ||
+ | ===== Maxima ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consider the following structures and write a maxima worksheet that returns in a parametric form the requested deflections, | ||
+ | |||
+ | A hollow circular cross section is assumed, for which all the centroidal directions are principal of inertia, and share a common moment of inertia J; the shear center is positioned in correspondence to the centroid. | ||
+ | See below for the actual sizing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{tablelayout? | ||
+ | ^ exercise | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, the unknown may be numerically evaluated according to the following sizing: | ||
+ | |||
+ | dim: | ||
+ | E=210000, | ||
+ | J=(40^4-36^4)*%pi/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The second Castigliano Theorem may be employed in evaluating rotations and deflections, | ||
+ | The axial load and the shear force contributions to the strain energy is to be assumed negligible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If needed, the reaction forces of a statically determinate structure may be defined by casting and solving in Maxima a suitable set of equilibrium equations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the case multiple loads (external loads or parametrically defined constraint reactions) are applied to the structure, it is suggested to define bending and torsional moment diagrams separately for each load, and then resorting to superposition in obtaining cumulative diagrams. | ||
+ | |||
+ | MSC.Marc may be employed in indipendently obtaining the unknown results. | ||
+ | See e.g. exercises 13-14. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In MSC.Marc, request the following outputs from the '' | ||
+ | * '' | ||
+ | * '' | ||
+ | * '' | ||
+ | * '' | ||
+ | those quantities may be observed by resorting to the '' | ||
+ | Diagrams may be scaled up to the requires size through the associated '' | ||